Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Authors: Weisberg et al. 

Link to paper:        

Journal/ Pre-Print: MedRxiv 

Tags; Immunology/Immunity, Clinical/ Diagnostics 

Research Highlights

1.     Measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) antibodies levels as well as neutralisation activity of plasma/sera in MIS-C, convalescent plasma donors, and severe COVID-19 ARDS adult patients. 

2.     MIS-C patients had a reduced antibody breadth and specificity for CoV-2; with IgG responses mainly directed against S protein. 

3.   MIS-C patients had reduced neutralising activity compared to the other cohorts.  


Weisberg et al. examined a cohort of 15 MIS-C patients, 14 COVID-19 adult ARDS patients, 19 convalescent plasma donors (CPD), and 8 pre-pandemic healthy controls. They compared levels of IgM, IgA and IgG to SARS-CoV-2 S and IgG to SARS-CoV-2 N proteins for the different groups. CPD and MIS-C patients had similar levels of antibodies against S protein, with higher levels in the COVID-19 ARDS groupHowever, MIS-C patients had reduced levels of anti-N antibodies compared with the other groups. Neutralizing activity of sera from MIS-C patients was reduced compared with the other CoV-infected groups.  

Impact for SARS-CoV2/COVID19 research efforts 

Understand the immune response to  SARS-CoV2/COVID19 

Study Type 

·      Clinical Cohort study (e.g. drug trials) 

Strengths and limitations of the paper 

Novelty: Comparison of IgM, IgA and IgG antibody levels to anti-S and anti-N in COVID-ARDS, MIS-C and donated convalescent plasma showing interesting differences that may be linked to the pathogenesis 

Standing in the field: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies measured for COVID-19 ARDS and CPD in previous studies. New information regarding antibodies in MIS-C patients with an analysis of specificity against S and N proteins.          

Appropriate statistics: Accurate and appropriate statistics, but more p-values needed for graphs. 

Viral model used: SARS-CoV-2 antigens and pseudovirus neutralisation assay  

Translatability: May be useful for diagnostic/prognostic purposes, and in the future to direct potential antibody-based therapies (e.g. using convalescent plasma when needed) 

Main limitations: 

  • Would have been interest to include other proteins such as RBD to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody measurements 

  • P-values needed for comparison between negative controls and comparison groups 

  • No antibody comparison to recovered children without MIS-C. 

  • Pseudovirus neutralization assay has a relatively high negative control measurement. 

  • More information needed on whether any children received IVIG which may impact antibody data.