Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

American Gastroenterologists are astonished by the low threshold that European colleagues have for using corticosteroids to treat acute ulcerative colitis. Likewise, European Gastroenterologists regard the massive doses of aminosalicylates used by US colleagues with interest, because they have yet to be convinced about the efficacy of this approach. As patient concern about steroid-induced side-effects increased, it seemed that Europeans were moving to a mid-Atlantic position, but case discussions at recent meetings have highlighted persistent differences in the initial treatment of a common condition. This is in spite of guidelines published on both sides of the Atlantic within the past 18 months (1,2), whose recommendations are not that dissimilar. They are, after all, based on the same evidence. The essence of the argument between the continents comes down to differences in emphasis placed on the speed and the degree of response.


Journal article


Practical Gastroenterology

Publication Date





66 - 70