Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AbstractT cell responses towards infections and cancers are regulated by a host of co-signalling receptors that are largely grouped into the binary categories of co-stimulation and co-inhibition. The TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4-1BB, CD27, GITR, and OX40 are well-established co-stimulation receptors with largely shared molecular pathways raising the question of whether they also have a similar impact on quantitative T cell responses, such as the efficacy, sensitivity, and duration of T cell responses. Here, we systematically stimulated primary human CD8+ T cell blasts with dose ranges of antigen and ligands for TNFRSF members to screen for their quantitative effects on cytokine production. Although both 4-1BB and CD27 increased efficacy, only 4-1BB was able to prolong the duration of cytokine production, and both had only a modest impact on antigen sensitivity. An operational model could explain these divergent quantitative phenotypes using a shared signalling mechanism based on the surface expression of 4-1BB, but not CD27, being regulated through a signalling feedback. The model predicted that CD27 co-stimulation would increase 4-1BB expression and subsequent 4-1BB co-stimulation, which we confirmed experimentally. Although GITR and OX40 produced only minor changes in cytokine production on their own, we found that like 4-1BB, CD27 could enhance GITR expression and subsequent GITR co-stimulation. Thus, feedback control of induced TNFRSF surface expression explains both synergy and differential impact on cytokine production. The work highlights that different co-stimulation receptors can have different quantitative phenotypes on the same output allowing for highly regulated control of T cell responses.

Original publication

DOI

10.1101/2021.07.02.450833

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Publication Date

03/07/2021